I know the word is "blessing" but really it's a spell right? That being so, the bug is that unholy blessed weapons don't have a magic flag. Should don't you think?
Comments
Carrion Fields
on 2007-01-04 06:33 UTC
Automatically imported from the legacy bug board forum.
Zulghinlour
on 2007-01-05 21:19 UTC
Subject: By design
From help unholy blessing...
This causes the weapon to become attuned to them, and has the
unfortunate side-effect of destroying any enchantments on the weapon.
Somedude
on 2007-01-05 21:21 UTC
Subject: You can't give them to Tahren to destroy.... nt
nt
Eulinda
on 2007-01-05 23:01 UTC
Subject: RE: By design
The help file statement is about destroying any pre-existing enchantments, like norem or nodrop. It doesn't make the weapon any less magical - lots of items are (magical) flagged, but have no enchantment on them.
The real question is how is the weapon being "attuned" to them? It's magic, isn't it? A big powerful very expensive spell being cast on the weapon, making it magically attuned to the antipaladin? I'm not sure how something could be more magical than that. N'est pas?
Carrion Fields on 2007-01-04 06:33 UTC
Automatically imported from the legacy bug board forum.
Zulghinlour on 2007-01-05 21:19 UTC
Subject: By design
From help unholy blessing...
This causes the weapon to become attuned to them, and has the
unfortunate side-effect of destroying any enchantments on the weapon.
Somedude on 2007-01-05 21:21 UTC
Subject: You can't give them to Tahren to destroy.... nt
nt
Eulinda on 2007-01-05 23:01 UTC
Subject: RE: By design
The help file statement is about destroying any pre-existing enchantments, like norem or nodrop. It doesn't make the weapon any less magical - lots of items are (magical) flagged, but have no enchantment on them.
The real question is how is the weapon being "attuned" to them? It's magic, isn't it? A big powerful very expensive spell being cast on the weapon, making it magically attuned to the antipaladin? I'm not sure how something could be more magical than that. N'est pas?
Zulghinlour on 2007-01-06 08:15 UTC
Subject: And I'll stick with my by design (n/t)
n/t